Exotic Matter

Am I as daffy (goofy; mentally non-reliable) as your normal, everyday physicist?

I have just, now, presently, stumbled upon something very intriguing: verification from physics that I am not crazy for believing, and claiming that I understand, free energy.

I’m watching a made-for-TV movie, called: “The Triangle”.

In episode 2, they mention what’s the mysterious reason for all of the bizarre stuff which is occurring surrounding the Bermuda Triangle. Regardless of its validity, they mention something called: “exotic matter”.

Looking it up, its Wikipedia article says some interesting things about it.

Under the heading of: negative mass, its expected behavior is exactly the same as what I witness whenever a simulation of a free energy circuit drives its current at an ever-accelerating rate (which we measure as an ever-increasing amperage) and in the direction which is opposed to the applied force which is driving it onward. This driving (applied) force we would describe as being the voltage which is associated with that current.

So, we’ve just explained the reversal of current moving towards an elevated source of voltage and moving away from a lesser area of voltage which is not conventional and violates entropy.

Imagine a wind moving away from a low-pressure zone towards a high-pressure zone. That would describe this situation by way of analogy, but is against our everyday, common sense of logical expectations.

Another interesting property of exotic matter is something called, “complex mass”. If the mass of an object is complex (namely, consists of measured quantities which are enumerated with both real and imaginary numbers), then its velocity must be faster than the speed of light.

For reasons I don’t understand, they (namely, theoretical physicists) also believe that this specific property of exotic matter, namely: if it is a complex mass, then it must travel backwards in time.

Again, this is exactly what my simulations of free energy have taught me which I published as a peer-reviewed article. — Easy to remember shortened URL: https://is.gd/abstractrelativity.

So, either free energy does not exist since all of electrodynamic theory is wrong. Or else, free energy is theoretically possible after all.

We need not even speculate whether or not theoretical physics is right or wrong since a simulator does not operate within the realm of physics. It operates within the realm of electrodynamic theory.

So, physics is not involved in this argument. Conservation has no bearing and is a distraction from this discussion.

Yet, that translates into a logical fallacy and, also, a conundrum since physics substantiates my claims while being non-relevant at the same time.

To hint that I am confused over this would be an understatement.

But at least I don’t have to think that I am alone. There are physicists which are just as mixed up as I am. Hallelujah!