30,000-year-old Unified Theory and the Self-Charging Battery of Ganesan Srinivasan
Introduction
After 8 years of direct experience with the trial and error process of designing and testing whether or not I can accidentally create a free energy circuit on various electronic simulators in an attempt to evoke over unity, I've had many successes and some failures (mostly, nothing but failures in the beginning), but most importantly, I've learned various relationships and principles behind the artistry of producing more output than it takes to run the electrical system producing that output.
This is in keeping with the theoretical principles of nonlinear dynamics in as much as we're not burning anything, such as fossil fuels, to uphold the applied science of thermodynamic principles regarding its necessity to conserve (account for) all of its energy. Instead, we're using the electrical reactance of coils and capacitors, augmented by resistances, to enlarge the scope of freely available imaginary power using the controlled (limited) chaos of nonlinear dynamics to produce a practical and safe outcome.
This is a race against entropy since entropy does not stop its encroachment upon whatever we attempt to do. But we can outrun it, in as much as this increase of imaginary power is at an exponential rate – the inverse of the exponential decline of energy due to entropy.
And if this rate of the increase of imaginary power should be greater than the rate of entropic decline, then eventually the growth of imaginary power will catch up and overtake the total quantity of energy left remaining in the system and add imaginary power to it (from that point forward) resulting in a greater quantity of potential energy than what will subsequently be taken away by entropic forces.
Furthermore, the potentiality of imaginary power is not useless in as much as it can be converted – within the resistive aspect of inductive heating coils – to boil water, and rotate steam turbines who are shackled to the axles of rotary electric generators and replace all of the fossil fuel plants and nuclear power plants on this planet with a purely electrical version of producing an equivalent quantity of power with none of the hazards associated with the pollution of our air or the prospect of nuclear leakages from the waste material produced by nuclear power plants.
By the way, heating coils are constructed out of a material which is so highly resistive, that it is easy for these types of coils to heat up. Yet, because they are made from a metallic alloy, they are much more durable than a simple resistor — which would fry itself if inserted into the accentuated amplitudes of current which can readily occur within my simulated circuits.
Discussion
So, what does any of this have to do with Professor Srinivasan, an astrophysicist who wrote a text not too long ago outlining the equivalencies between physics and the ancient system of yoga known as Sankhya? 1 2
It turns out that many of my beliefs and conceptualizations about free energy (in particular) and energy (in general) are exactly stated within Sankhya Yoga according to the interpretations of Professor Srinivasan.
For example…
Communication of information across the vast distances of empty space is achieved, simultaneously, utilizing all of the linkages which unite all of the particles in creation with a bond that is predicated on the dielectric force in as much as the vacuum state is one of many variations which a dielectric medium can become making it possible for a charge-potential to become stored between the two plates of a capacitor. The nucleus of every atom in existence is a nexus where innumerable branches of dielectric lines of force converge.
This simultaneity of communication is made possible by the lack of any intrinsic property which we call time.
Instead, time is a byproduct of a particular oscillation set to a particular frequency. Anything vibrating at that frequency has that frequency as its reference for time. All other frequencies of oscillations are moving forward in time faster or slower than any other frequency giving the illusion of shifts-in-time which undermine the credibility of the Conservation of Thermodynamic Energy possessing any relevance to the nonlinear dynamics of Chaotic Energy. — Please see, Emmy Nother’s theorem, on Wikipedia, regarding a loophole within the Conservation of Energy which allows for its refutation since, according to that article, she invented the concept of the Conservation of Energy. But be warned of their use of a double negative making it very difficult to discern what the editors of that article are attempting to convey! A few quotes from that article…
“…if the theory's symmetry is time invariance, then the conserved quantity is called 'energy’.” — My editorial comment: if time never alters its rate-of-progression nor alter its forward-direction, then something called ‘energy’ will be conservable. Otherwise, it is not energy nor is conservable.
Consider imaginary power, for example. Imaginary power is not power, because its square root of negative numbers makes it impossible to find its solution within the field of real numbers. Hence, it is an immeasurable quantity. If it cannot be measure, then it is an artistry of fiction within the minds of all scientists and mathematicians. Yet…!
Pass imaginary power through an inductive heating coil…..boil water….etc, ergo real power is the result, namely: the application of something useless (imaginary power) all of a sudden becomes useful.
Imaginary power is not useless; it is lossless. So long as it remains within the realm of our imagination (under the auspices of the square root of its negative polarity), then it will forever endear itself to our hearts and minds as a potentially infinite realm of energetic possibility!
Warning! Here comes the use of a double-negative » » » “…systems that »» are not invariant «« under shifts in time (e.g. systems with time-dependent potential energy) do not exhibit conservation of energy…” — Wouldn’t it have been easier to simply say, “…systems that »» are variant «« under shifts in time (e.g. systems with time-dependent potential energy) do not exhibit conservation of energy…”?
In any case, the phrase of » » » “time-dependent potential energy” should suggest to us right away that the potentialities of electrical reactance — such as: frequency, capacitive reactance and inductive reactance, over a duration of time — spawn another potentiality known as: imaginary power.
By the way, imaginary power does not transmit very well. It doesn’t exist, so how can it travel? It must be used where it is needed; ergo, free energy is a local benefit which must be converted into real power to be capable of transmission. Otherwise, use it where it is produced and discard the remainder (in a safe manner). It’s free anyway. So, why worry over its waste? Do you know how much power is wasted within the Newman device? A humungous amount as I learned while simulating it within LTspice. 3
The timelessness of the eternal now makes it possible for the intrinsic nature of space, known variously as: the Aether or Akash (what I suspect is equivalent to Eric P. Dollard’s “counter-space”), to be capable of storing the memory of everything which occurs within it. This has been observed by George Van Tassel when he claims, within a YouTube video, 4 that he was able to witness radio and television broadcast programs that had occurred many years prior emanating from broadcast stations which no longer exist, because the magnetic field of the Earth remembers those broadcasts and will never forget them!
The timelessness of this eternal now also makes it possible for all things to occur simultaneously – not merely the act of communication.
So, I have precedence supporting me as if I'm not the only one speaking and making these wild-eyed claims that people think I make. We are simply ignorant of Indian knowledge and what the Vedas have to offer us. But that's common for us Westerners! We think we're the only ones on the planet who know anything about everything, hahaha 🤣.
As I told a roommate 7 years ago, I already know this stuff. I'm simply remembering what I already know to be true buried deep in some sequestered subliminal area of my psyche, probably a reflection of my soul memory, and need to dig it out by all these countless hours I have spent on the computer with my trial-and-error simulations, aka Edison style, to provoke over unity from my circuits. And in the course of doing so, going online and asking formally educated people to help me understand the patterns of behavior that I see unfolding in front of my face and explain it to me so that (hopefully) I can understand what is taking place.
And then I had to appeal to AI because I had already sucked all the information out of people that I could possibly extract, because they're not taught everything about their profession. They are only taught enough to make a living and maintain the status quo of a society predicated upon our reputations and the amount of power and influence we can exercise because of our reputations.
So, it is gratifying to know that a human being – who is still alive – wrote about what I understand to be true by simply interpreting an ancient text from Vedic wisdom that had never been interpreted in the manner that he did so. Quite enlightening!
In his 500-page exposé of Sankhya Yoga, according to his interpretations with regard to physics, he spent a few pages outlining what he called: a self-charging battery. I don't think I succeeded at simulating it in Paul Falstad's simulator. But I did the best I could and came up with an interesting similitude which is worth making note of down below. Enjoy it if you can!
It makes use of the difference between two pairs of batteries whose initial storage of voltage is a thousand times of difference between these two pairs. When placed within this simulated circuit, an interesting thing happens. The pair of batteries of greater potential do nothing but discharge their force to the lesser pair of batteries possessing a thousand times less voltage than the former pair. And that second pair of weaker batteries do nothing, for the most part, but acquire a charge of negative amperes. Meanwhile, the pair of batteries of greater potential are doing nothing but discharging their storage of potential as measured in positive amperes.
https://tinyurl.com/srinivasanscbv2
😌
G. Srinivasan astronomy Sankhya – a Google search
G. Srinivasan’s “Secret of Sankhya: Acme of Scientific Unification” — another Google search