What is Free Energy?
{outside of thermodynamics}
Let's begin with a different question…
What is an earth ground?
An earth ground is a voltage source which is set to zero-volts as a default condition.
This is why the circuit simulator1 of Paul Falstad lists his “Add Ground” component under the subcategory called “Inputs and Sources”.
Thus, we could derive an indeterminate amount of current from this zero-source for voltage if, instead of expecting to push current from a source-of-voltage, we pulled current from out of this zero-voltage condition.
Could this be considered a free lunch? Yes!
Because we will only succeed if we avoid undue levels of voltage lest we smother our good intentions and squander our limited resources in our pursuit of free energy.
Parasitic oscillations will be our initial goal. These oscillations will be free of regulatory control since that's all a traditional voltage source amounts to (anyway) whenever it is set to anything other than zero volts.
A zero source for voltage is an unlimited source for current if we know how to take advantage of this possibility.
These parasitic oscillations will possess an escalating frequency2 (way above 50/60 cycles per second) which will accelerate the reactive impedances in an attempt to outstrip entropy while avoiding the pitfalls of the application of voltage, such as the pitfall of the cost of energy should the voltage source become drained when it converts into current.
What is entropy?
Entropy is an impedance with a mathematical value of a positive sign (+).
But what we want to generate are negative impedances possessing a mathematical value of a negative sign (-).
Since the only distinction between these two types of impedances is a question of signage, then we may assume that each of these two types of impedances always coexist.
For example, an airline pilot almost always has to confront a factor of the wind whenever flying a plane. But how much of that wind is a tailwind versus a headwind will make all the difference between arriving at his destination on time versus delayed.
Yet each of these two choices possess one thing in common: the wind.
As an aside, it is considered to be standard theory to associate a positive Impedance with a load condition while a negative Impedance is associated with the generation of power.
Hence, there's not much difference between these two conditions except for their distinguishing signage.
Do you see what I am driving at?
The next time someone who professes to be knowledgeable about the laws of physics shoves the Conservation of Energy in your face (along with the Laws of Thermodynamics) to preclude you from taking nonlinear dynamics seriously, you may remind yourself how easy it is to mistake a villain for a hero since there is little difference between the two except for signage.
Power is very similar to moral fiber in which there are no hard and fast rules defining when power corrupts versus when morality becomes heroic? Each could just as readily switch into the other’s status in the twinkling of an eye.
This is how I define impedance and, thus, is why I don't worry about the laws of physics!
I can't prevent professionals who are formally trained in physics to appreciate nonlinear dynamics when they have been programmed and brainwashed during their scholastic endeavors to ignore nonlinear dynamics and pay strict attention and give a great deal of emphasis to the Conservation of Energy and the Laws of Thermodynamics as if nonlinear dynamics had no merit.
Free energy is not exclusively defined by the theories of Helmholtz and Gibbs!
Unlike this minor distinction of signage, there is a major difference in consciousness ranging from the lowest state of consciousness of the deepest state of dreamless sleep versus the most elevated vibration encompassing the Mind of the Cosmos which never sleeps.
It is within this context in which I pursue my study of the nonlinear dynamics of free energy3 while ignoring the thermodynamics of free energy (courtesy of Helmholtz and Gibbs), because thermodynamics pursues the chemical changes which occur whenever we “burn” fuel whereas nonlinear dynamics examines the viral condition which infects our electrical and mechanical devices.
Unlike a biological virus, a computer virus has no material existence apart from its host.
But similar to a viral organism infecting a living organism, a computer already contains sufficient energy within its hardware to give a computer virus sufficient liveliness to execute its viral set of instructions for destroying its host.
Likewise does a circuit contain all of the reactance it could ever require to blow itself up. This potential form of energy is sequestered within the materials of its construction.
All it takes is the nonlinear dynamics of electrical reactance to authorize the parasitic excitation of the reactive properties (which are inherent within a physical device) to steal, harvest, recycle and reuse the scant quantity of energy we intentionally feed a free energy circuit to starve this circuit into a state of motivation in which the circuit will pursue and engage in extreme scavenging tactics to make up the difference for the energy which it lacks.
This type of engineering perspective makes it possible to proclaim the idiocy of making war against anyone who possesses sources of energy which the attacker does not possess when (in fact) it is not relevant who possesses what and in what quantity since the only thing that matters is how efficiently do we get work done with whatever paucity of energy or wealth of energy we may already possess.
All we do (when we initiate the energy production of a nuclear power plant or a fossil-burning fuel plant) is the heating of water to the boiling point to rotate a steam turbine which is shackled to the axle of a rotary electric generator. Yet, we use these fuels to power these energy production plants merely once and then it's gone - it's spent and there's no getting it back once it's been burned.
But the energy production plant (of an electrical reactance format) reuses the same energy over and over again in addition to borrowing it from its environment. And merely by passing it back and forth across the load, in an oscillatory manner and at a very rapid pace of oscillations, does this style of energy production make it look like we're getting an abundance of energy from somewhere other than what we officially give the circuit to run on.
We bounce this energy off of impedances rather than storing and discharging it, because the process of storage and discharge would take too much time causing us to lose the resonance of our oscillatory reflections if we did not bounce the energy off of our reactive storage components (such as capacitors and inductors) and bypass the time delay which is inherent during the normal storage and discharging process of reactive components.
This procedure of reflective bouncing, to avoid the time delay of storage and discharge, is why we encourage a parasitic frequency to overtake the non-parasitic oscillations which conventional wisdom expects to find occurring within our circuit.
Well, I've had enough of discussing theory. Why don't we take a look at an example?
By pairing capacitors and transformer coils in modules of two each per module, inspired by the analog computer of Eric P. Dollard4 operating in longitudinal magneto-dielectric modality,56 it is possible to smoothly simulate the explosion of reactive impedance making it look like (for all intents and purposes) an explosion of energy capable of destroying its host-circuit just as effectively as if this dynamism were entirely composed of energy, alone, without any reactance interceding on its behalf.
We create two modes of operation for this particular archetype of an overunity circuit.
One mode of operation is the creation of a surge, that is not a transient, but is a sustained surge reaching up all the way to the infinite oblivion of its host should it not be terminated before that self-destruction occurs.
The second mode of operation is the dissipation of the energy which the simulator thinks has accrued when (of course) we know, otherwise, is the reactance which has accrued - not any mysterious energy arriving from an unknown source.
This dissipation of energy follows the normal rule of entropy by passing this constantly recycled energy out through resistive heating elements, in the following example, with the intention of boiling water to replace the use of nuclear materials or fossil fuels to perform the same results which are performed in the standard power plants of our semi-modern era.
https://tinyurl.com/infinitewatts2boilwater
Figure 1 - Surge mode.
Figure 2 - Dissipation mode.
There’s a caveat, or an asset depending on how you want to view the simulation, above, in that the transformers of Paul Falstad do not leak any D/C. Nor are they capable of becoming saturated with D/C or A/C.7 Thus, they are able to transfer D/C among their primary and secondary coils since any quantity of D/C power or A/C power, which is applied to them, will become absorbed as if their core was infinitely large and infinitely massive. This is what makes them “ideal” transformers.
For this reason, they’re great for simulating overunity.
A magamp (magnetic amplifier)8 arrangement may make it possible to approach replicating them in the real-world of physical builds.
Enlarging their core, and adding a suitable ferromagnetic material which could be magnetically coupled to their core, may also help. This was the method cited by William Lyne in his book, “Occult Ether Physics”, in which Mr. Lyne quotes Nikola Tesla as stating that, “For every 200 pounds of iron added to Tesla’s Special Generator, its output was increased by one horsepower”.9
A suitable core material must be capable of performing a Perpetual Motion Holder experiment of Edward Leedskalnin.10 These types of core materials exhibit magnetic memory, known as: remanence, and were used between the years of 1955 and 1975 as computer core memory.11 12
Did I leave anything out of this discussion?13 Let me know in the comments, below.
And please subscribe if you like what you see and have a little bit of pocket change to toss in my direction! :-] 😏
Commentary posted to "The Magnetic Amplifier" at Nuts and Volts magazine in which Shane M. was attempting to replicate a magamp using Paul Falstad’s simulator without success since Paul’s transformers are modeled as being “ideal” and, thus, are not capable of becoming saturated.
Further we do not live in a closed system. Energy is leaving and entering our system constantly.
Excellent thread- The lost idiots from the “Church of Einstein” are creating chaos for everyone. The crime syndicate is hiding extremely advanced technology in private companies that don’t have to disclose anything. This must come to an end. The poisons we’re infecting the earth is going to turn it into a hell-scape.
COP> 1 is ridiculed by the “Schooled PHD’s” in electrical engineering. They’re clueless as well as ignorant.