Reactive Impedance is the Holy Grail (Source) of Free Energy

If electrical engineers spent more time developing so-called “unstable” circuits, rather than bad-mouthing free energy as a violation of physics, we might have a more interesting universe in our neck of the Galaxy!

But, unfortunately, they want to get paid. They don't care about the consumer so much as what's in it for them.

So, we're stuck with a mediocre mindset among electrical engineers who are not interested in improving the quality of our life.

Electrical engineers are allowed to call free energy circuits “unstable” and (thus) bad-mouth them and avoid their behavior at all cost. It's a strange and roundabout way of acknowledgment – by way of persecution and misunderstanding – since the bad-mouthing does not help enlighten us (a whole lot) except to say that a circuit which is unstable is not going to adhere to the Conservation of Energy, wouldn't you think?

And this instability, although laudable within the realm of free energy supporters, is also scary because it takes away the aspect of “privilege” from our social order.

If anybody could have abundant energy at a cost which is nearly zero, but not entirely zero, where are the “haves” and where are the “have nots”? Where are the wealthy and where are the impoverished? These sorts of distinctions will become a bygone memory (long since forgotten) if anything of what I have been posting became common sense among professionals, such as electrical engineers, and the lay public.

---

For additional background references, please see my prior posts, entitled…

---

🤔